From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263454AbTJQPrr (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:47:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263485AbTJQPrr (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:47:47 -0400 Received: from chaos.analogic.com ([204.178.40.224]:14209 "EHLO chaos.analogic.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263454AbTJQPrp (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:47:45 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:49:16 -0400 (EDT) From: "Richard B. Johnson" X-X-Sender: root@chaos Reply-To: root@chaos.analogic.com To: David Woodhouse cc: Suresh Subramanian , Linux kernel Subject: Re: killing a kernel thread. In-Reply-To: <1066405067.6744.1444.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <1066405067.6744.1444.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, David Woodhouse wrote: > Ooh ooh RBJcode. I'm going to be fair and only pick one of the errors, > leaving many more for others to play the game too... > > > On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 09:51 -0400, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > > > __u32 volatile status; > > > while (!test_bit(0,&priv->status)) { > > test_bit() and friends work on 'unsigned long' not uint32_t. > > -- > dwmw2 > Well it isn't RBJcode. It's Intel code. Look who wrote it before you give me any credit, especially your kind of "credit". Also, Intel machines have 32-bit longs which are identical to 32-bit ints and this was an Intel driver........ Have fun growing up. Cheers, Dick Johnson Penguin : Linux version 2.4.22 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips). Note 96.31% of all statistics are fiction.