From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263588AbTJ0VGL (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2003 16:06:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263612AbTJ0VGK (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2003 16:06:10 -0500 Received: from modemcable137.219-201-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca ([24.201.219.137]:18048 "EHLO montezuma.fsmlabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263588AbTJ0VGJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2003 16:06:09 -0500 Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 16:05:39 -0500 (EST) From: Zwane Mwaikambo To: Andi Kleen cc: "J.A. Magallon" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Specific Processor Optimizations on x86 Architecture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Andi Kleen wrote: > The wmb() change is not needed, unless you have an oostore CPU > (x86 has ordered writes by default). It probably does not hurt > neither though (I do it the same way on x86-64), but also doesn't > change anything. The original intent was to fix an SMP P5 system, it oopses otherwise under load.