From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267476AbUBRUaK (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:30:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267710AbUBRUaK (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:30:10 -0500 Received: from chaos.analogic.com ([204.178.40.224]:60288 "EHLO chaos.analogic.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267476AbUBRUaG convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:30:06 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:32:57 -0500 (EST) From: "Richard B. Johnson" X-X-Sender: root@chaos Reply-To: root@chaos.analogic.com To: =?US-ASCII?Q?Markus_H=E4stbacka?= cc: Linux kernel Subject: Re: [NET] 64 bit byte counter for 2.6.3 In-Reply-To: <20040218101711.25dda791@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> Message-ID: References: <1077123078.9223.7.camel@midux> <20040218101711.25dda791@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Markus Hästbacka wrote: > Ok, Here's a patch for 64 bit byte counters for 2.6.3. For any intrested > users to try. Manipulation of a 'long long' is not atomic in 32 bit architectures. Please explain how we don't care, if we shouldn't care. Also some /proc entries might get read incorrectly with existing tools. Cheers, Dick Johnson Penguin : Linux version 2.4.24 on an Pentium III machine (1797.90 BogoMips). Note 96.31% of all statistics are fiction.