From: "Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com>
To: John Bradford <john@grabjohn.com>
Cc: Shobhit Mathur <shobhitmmathur@yahoo.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PCI excessive retry error
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 10:07:43 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0405100955220.28392@chaos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200405101231.i4ACVTa7000421@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk>
On Mon, 10 May 2004, John Bradford wrote:
> > I mentioned a "broken bus" in the beginning. Some new
> > PCI boards are not 5-volt tolerant. If you plug them into
> > the PCI bus of some motherboards (Intel 865PE chipset),
> > The Intel D865PERL, for one, the PCI/Bus will get blown.
> > Same with the MS-6585 (648 MAX board). I blew up several
> > boards by plugging 3.5 volt PCI cards into the 5 volt
> > bus. According to the rules, it's supposed to work unless
> > the PCI slots have "Cadium Yellow" or "Brilliant Blue"
> > keying plugs (I kid you not, it's in the PCI specs).
>
> So, did you actually plug the cards in to the wrong coloured slots, or
> do you have a 3.5 volt-incompatible motherboard with a colour of slots
> which suggests compatibility?
>
> John.
>
I have two broken motherboards that have off-white color slots
that imply that they should certainly not blow up if anything
that fits is plugged into them!
So I plugged in two high-speed data-link boards and nothing worked.
Upon removal of the boards, my SCSI controller was no longer seen
on the PCI/Bus. I called the data-link board vendor (actually a
division of this company) and they said; "Idiot! They are 3.5 volt
boards!". I said; "Yeh? The PCI Spec says they should be compatible!"
They said; "There is no PCI spec for such compatibility......", etc.
etc. When I quoted the page on the book, they said; "That's only a
BOOK, not a specification...." It's just like the l-k list.
So, some new PCI/Bus boards are not 5-volt tolerant. Some new
board slots run at 3.5 volts so older PCI/Bus boards won't
work (some do, some don't). It's a mess.
I also asked our wizards in the other division what kind of
platform the boards were supposed to be working in. They said
it was secret, but not a PC.
Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.4.26 on an i686 machine (5557.45 BogoMips).
Note 96.31% of all statistics are fiction.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-10 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-10 11:33 Shobhit Mathur
2004-05-10 12:17 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-05-10 12:31 ` John Bradford
2004-05-10 14:07 ` Richard B. Johnson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.53.0405100955220.28392@chaos \
--to=root@chaos.analogic.com \
--cc=john@grabjohn.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shobhitmmathur@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®