mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com>
To: reg@dwf.com
Cc: Brian Gerst <bgerst@didntduck.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reg@orion.dwf.com,
	linux@horizon.com, reg@orion.dwf.com
Subject: Re: Intel 875 Motherboard cant use 4GB of Memory.
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 07:46:58 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0406030743260.3377@chaos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200406030232.i532W4eU008705@orion.dwf.com>

On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 reg@dwf.com wrote:

> >
> > Wrong.  Ever since the Pentium Pro, x86 processors have had 36-bit
> > *physical* addressing.  This is why PAE-mode paging was introduced.  A
> > sane BIOS would configure the memory controller to remap some of the
> > memory above 4G physical to allow for memory mapped devices.  It sounds
> > like this board's BIOS isn't doing that, or at least not reporting it in
> > the e820 map.
> >
> Hummm.
>
> Let me restate the fact that I dont understand how PC hardware works, but
> I can understand how the area for PCI devices has to come out of the
> KERNEL address space, but why does it have to be subtracted from the USER
> address space too?
>
>
> --
>                                         Reg.Clemens
>                                         reg@dwf.com


It isn't. However some of the user address-space is used by the kernel
so a user can't address 32 bits of (data) space either. The sum of
the address-spaces that each user can access can far exceed all the
RAM and certainly 32-bits of space. That's why we have swap-files.


Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.4.26 on an i686 machine (5570.56 BogoMips).
            Note 96.31% of all statistics are fiction.



  reply	other threads:[~2004-06-03 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-01  7:32 reg
2004-06-01 19:56 ` reg
2004-06-01 20:10   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-06-02  9:56     ` Jurriaan
2004-06-02 12:17   ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-06-02 19:52     ` clemens
2004-06-03  1:11     ` Brian Gerst
2004-06-03  2:32       ` reg
2004-06-03 11:46         ` Richard B. Johnson [this message]
2004-06-03  3:03       ` clemens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.53.0406030743260.3377@chaos \
    --to=root@chaos.analogic.com \
    --cc=bgerst@didntduck.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@horizon.com \
    --cc=reg@dwf.com \
    --cc=reg@orion.dwf.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®