From: "Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com>
To: reg@dwf.com
Cc: Brian Gerst <bgerst@didntduck.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reg@orion.dwf.com,
linux@horizon.com, reg@orion.dwf.com
Subject: Re: Intel 875 Motherboard cant use 4GB of Memory.
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 07:46:58 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0406030743260.3377@chaos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200406030232.i532W4eU008705@orion.dwf.com>
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 reg@dwf.com wrote:
> >
> > Wrong. Ever since the Pentium Pro, x86 processors have had 36-bit
> > *physical* addressing. This is why PAE-mode paging was introduced. A
> > sane BIOS would configure the memory controller to remap some of the
> > memory above 4G physical to allow for memory mapped devices. It sounds
> > like this board's BIOS isn't doing that, or at least not reporting it in
> > the e820 map.
> >
> Hummm.
>
> Let me restate the fact that I dont understand how PC hardware works, but
> I can understand how the area for PCI devices has to come out of the
> KERNEL address space, but why does it have to be subtracted from the USER
> address space too?
>
>
> --
> Reg.Clemens
> reg@dwf.com
It isn't. However some of the user address-space is used by the kernel
so a user can't address 32 bits of (data) space either. The sum of
the address-spaces that each user can access can far exceed all the
RAM and certainly 32-bits of space. That's why we have swap-files.
Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.4.26 on an i686 machine (5570.56 BogoMips).
Note 96.31% of all statistics are fiction.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-03 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-01 7:32 reg
2004-06-01 19:56 ` reg
2004-06-01 20:10 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-06-02 9:56 ` Jurriaan
2004-06-02 12:17 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-06-02 19:52 ` clemens
2004-06-03 1:11 ` Brian Gerst
2004-06-03 2:32 ` reg
2004-06-03 11:46 ` Richard B. Johnson [this message]
2004-06-03 3:03 ` clemens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.53.0406030743260.3377@chaos \
--to=root@chaos.analogic.com \
--cc=bgerst@didntduck.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@horizon.com \
--cc=reg@dwf.com \
--cc=reg@orion.dwf.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®