From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264701AbUGGAjP (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2004 20:39:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264725AbUGGAjP (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2004 20:39:15 -0400 Received: from chaos.analogic.com ([204.178.40.224]:24196 "EHLO chaos.analogic.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264701AbUGGAjO (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2004 20:39:14 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 20:38:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "Richard B. Johnson" X-X-Sender: root@chaos Reply-To: root@chaos.analogic.com To: David Eger cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 0xdeadbeef vs 0xdeadbeefL In-Reply-To: <20040706215622.GA9505@havoc.gtf.org> Message-ID: References: <20040706215622.GA9505@havoc.gtf.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, David Eger wrote: > Is there a reason to add the 'L' to such a 32-bit constant like this? > There doesn't seem a great rhyme to it in the headers... > > -dte Well if you put the 'name' so we could search for the reason..... It probably is used for magic to initialize long-words. Without the L, you may get a 'C' warning error because numbers default to 'int'. Cheers, Dick Johnson Penguin : Linux version 2.4.26 on an i686 machine (5570.56 BogoMips). Note 96.31% of all statistics are fiction.