mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
To: Marc Sowen <marc.sowen@tu-harburg.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Intel PRO/Wireless 2100 vs. Broadcom BCM9430x
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 10:08:07 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0306120957260.3626@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001101c330f5$771bd7a0$0101230a@apollo>

On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Marc Sowen wrote:

> Hi everybody,
>
> I hope this is not too off-topic, but the fact is that neither the Intel
> PRO/Wireless 2100 (Centrino) chipset nor the Broadcom BCM9430x (e.g.
> Dell Truemobile 1180/1300/1400) chipset is currently supported in Linux
> due to FCC regulation problems.
>
> Anyhow, I plan to get a new Notebook within the next 2 or 3 weeks and I
> need to decide, whether to go for the Intel PRO/Wireless 2100 or the
> Broadcom BCM9430x chipset. I know it's hard to say, but what do you
> think, which company (Intel or Broadcom) is more likely to release the
> necessary documents and/or drivers for their chipsets? Both companys
> seem to ignore all inquiries concerning Linux support at the moment.

I used to win the "Dumb context 2003" by buying a laptop w/out checking
the hw compatibility list. It was first sight love :) Now after a series
of custom patches (SiS chipset, pcmcia irq selection, local apic,...)
everything is working fine but the Broadcom integrated WLAN. I suggest you
to go with a machine w/out the integrated WLAN and then buy a supported
pcmcia card (orinoco prismII works great on my machine). To understand who
between Intel and Broadcom will first release specs, take a look at their
web sites for documentation/specs. The answer will become pretty easy.



- Davide


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-06-12 16:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-12 15:15 Marc Sowen
2003-06-12 15:16 ` Joel Jaeggli
2003-06-12 17:20   ` Cisco Aironet mini-PCI wireless card (MPI-350) [Was: Re: Intel PRO/Wireless 2100 vs. Broadcom BCM9430x] Jan Mynarik
2003-06-12 17:46     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2003-06-13 10:58       ` Jan Mynarik
2003-06-13 16:29         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2003-06-12 20:37   ` Intel PRO/Wireless 2100 vs. Broadcom BCM9430x Anders Karlsson
2003-06-12 21:17     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2003-06-12 21:52       ` Anders Karlsson
2003-06-12 21:57         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2003-06-13  3:56     ` Joel Jaeggli
2003-06-12 17:08 ` Davide Libenzi [this message]
2003-06-12 17:22   ` Disconnect
2003-06-12 18:07 ` Martin List-Petersen
2003-06-12 20:35 ` Anders Karlsson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.55.0306120957260.3626@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.com \
    --to=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.sowen@tu-harburg.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®