From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263976AbTJ1OW0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:22:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263980AbTJ1OW0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:22:26 -0500 Received: from windsormachine.com ([206.48.122.28]:5100 "EHLO router.windsormachine.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263976AbTJ1OWZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:22:25 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:22:22 -0500 (EST) From: Mike Dresser To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Heavy disk activity without apperant reason (added more info) In-Reply-To: <3F9E5DFA.2000008@aitel.hist.no> Message-ID: References: <3F9BC429.6060608@planet.nl> <3F9D0BBB.9080600@aitel.hist.no> <3F9D7120.1020207@planet.nl> <3F9E5DFA.2000008@aitel.hist.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-scanner: scanned by Inflex 1.0.12.3 - (http://pldaniels.com/inflex/) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Helge Hafting wrote: > dnetc is the most active process here. I don't know > what it _is_ - could it be doing lots of disk > writes? likely the distributed.net client, shouldnt' normally be doing any disk writing at all except between blocks.