From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263609AbTJCCn5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Oct 2003 22:43:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263613AbTJCCn5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Oct 2003 22:43:57 -0400 Received: from genericorp.net ([69.56.190.66]:27323 "EHLO narbuckle.genericorp.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263609AbTJCCnz (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Oct 2003 22:43:55 -0400 Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 21:43:34 -0500 (CDT) From: Dave O X-X-Sender: count@narbuckle.genericorp.net To: Mike Fedyk cc: Roman Zippel , linux-hfsplus-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] new HFS(+) driver In-Reply-To: <20031003002608.GC13051@matchmail.com> Message-ID: References: <20031003002608.GC13051@matchmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Mike Fedyk wrote: > On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 02:00:25PM -0500, Dave O wrote: > > This works, however du(1) seems to get the block size wrong: > > > > meatloop:/cdrom# ls -l > > total 393244 > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 501 dialout 341952833 Sep 22 17:24 else.zip > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 501 dialout 450701627 Sep 22 20:07 outlook.zip > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 501 dialout 607534655 Sep 22 17:26 quick1.zip > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 501 dialout 431279243 Sep 22 17:26 quick2.zip > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 501 dialout 605501959 Sep 22 17:27 quick3.zip > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 501 dialout 403836898 Sep 22 17:28 quick4.zip > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 501 dialout 380636073 Sep 22 17:28 quick5.zip > > > > meatloop:/cdrom# du -sh > > 385M . > > Are you sure? I haven't done the math, but you are comparing base 1000 to > base 1024 numbers. Try comparing: > > du -sh . > ls -lh > There's not that much to be sure about. A single file there (else.zip) is over 300 megs itself, and the total of all the files is about 3 gigs