From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264106AbTLJVFA (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:05:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264119AbTLJVFA (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:05:00 -0500 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:60304 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264106AbTLJVE5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:04:57 -0500 Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 22:04:34 +0100 (CET) From: Ingo Molnar Reply-To: Ingo Molnar To: Andre Hedrick Cc: Linus Torvalds , Maciej Zenczykowski , David Schwartz , Jason Kingsland , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Andre Hedrick wrote: > Then the trick is when does the license flip modes? > Compile time? > Execution time? a license does not 'trigger' or 'flip'. Either the full source code is licensed under the GPL (by the copyright holders) or not. a given piece of code might be licensed under an infinite number of other licenses as well, but this doesnt matter a bit, as long as the GPL is one of them. > This starts to become more fuzzy than I care to look at right now. then ask a lawyer. Ingo