From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261595AbTLTVnd (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Dec 2003 16:43:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261613AbTLTVnc (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Dec 2003 16:43:32 -0500 Received: from modemcable178.89-70-69.mc.videotron.ca ([69.70.89.178]:62338 "EHLO montezuma.fsmlabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261595AbTLTVn0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Dec 2003 16:43:26 -0500 Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 16:41:23 -0500 (EST) From: Zwane Mwaikambo To: Nick Piggin cc: Andrew Morton , mingo@elte.hu, hawkes@babylon.engr.sgi.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, johnstul@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] 2.6.0-test11 sched_clock() broken for "drifty ITC" In-Reply-To: <3FE466ED.5060701@cyberone.com.au> Message-ID: References: <200312182044.hBIKiCLY5477429@babylon.engr.sgi.com> <20031220105031.GA17848@elte.hu> <3FE46345.1040102@cyberone.com.au> <20031220070532.05b7b268.akpm@osdl.org> <3FE466ED.5060701@cyberone.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Nick Piggin wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > >miaow ;) Andrew what are they feeding you these days? ;) > I'm just thinking that computers with unsynched clocks have less > need for good interactivity, but thats probably too narrow and x86 > a view anyway. x86 and TSCs don't do that great a job either ;)