From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263776AbTLUReY (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Dec 2003 12:34:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263832AbTLUReY (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Dec 2003 12:34:24 -0500 Received: from scrub.xs4all.nl ([194.109.195.176]:14863 "EHLO scrub.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263776AbTLUReX (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Dec 2003 12:34:23 -0500 Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 18:34:17 +0100 (CET) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@serv To: Marcel Holtmann cc: Randy Dunlap , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Difference between select and enable in Kconfig In-Reply-To: <1072027326.2684.72.camel@pegasus> Message-ID: References: <1071974814.2684.41.camel@pegasus> <20031220205433.195037e8.rddunlap@osdl.org> <1072027326.2684.72.camel@pegasus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > > case P_SELECT: > > sym2 = prop_get_symbol(prop); > > if ((sym->type != S_BOOLEAN && sym->type != S_TRISTATE) || > > (sym2->type != S_BOOLEAN && sym2->type != S_TRISTATE)) > > fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:warning: enable is only allowed with boolean and tristate symbols\n", > > ~~~~~~ > > so both options achieve the same result. Why do we have two different > options for the same stuff? Should we not remove one? It was called first 'enable' and later renamed into 'select', which is now the official version, so 'enable' could be indeed removed. bye, Roman