From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263510AbTLXKNe (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Dec 2003 05:13:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263513AbTLXKNe (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Dec 2003 05:13:34 -0500 Received: from mx13.sac.fedex.com ([199.81.197.53]:17939 "EHLO mx13.sac.fedex.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263510AbTLXKNd (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Dec 2003 05:13:33 -0500 Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 18:11:54 +0800 (SGT) From: Jeff Chua X-X-Sender: jchua@silk.corp.fedex.com To: "Randy.Dunlap" cc: Linux Kernel , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [bug] 2.6.0 COMMAND_LINE_SIZE <160??? In-Reply-To: <20031223092104.6bc9f634.rddunlap@osdl.org> Message-ID: References: <20031223092104.6bc9f634.rddunlap@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on ENTPM11/FEDEX(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 12/24/2003 06:13:29 PM, Serialize by Router on ENTPM11/FEDEX(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 12/24/2003 06:13:31 PM, Serialize complete at 12/24/2003 06:13:31 PM Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 21:07:45 +0800 (SGT) Jeff Chua wrote: > > Same processor arch. type in both .config files? > Same compiler version building them? Same for both. gcc 2.95.3 20010315 glibc-2.2.5-34 perhaps, it's loadlin or linld problem, or fat32 problem. The difference is lilo doesn't need _dos_ to boot. I tried to replace ./arch/i386/boot/setup.S with the one from 2.4.24-pre1 and it seems to go further before it breaks. What's next to debug this? Thanks, Jeff