From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264326AbTL3BiL (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Dec 2003 20:38:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264333AbTL3BiL (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Dec 2003 20:38:11 -0500 Received: from [24.35.117.106] ([24.35.117.106]:3723 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264326AbTL3BiJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Dec 2003 20:38:09 -0500 Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 20:37:53 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Molina X-X-Sender: tmolina@localhost.localdomain To: Roger Luethi cc: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: 2.6.0 performance problems In-Reply-To: <20031230012551.GA6226@k3.hellgate.ch> Message-ID: References: <20031230012551.GA6226@k3.hellgate.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Roger Luethi wrote: > I bet this is just yet another instance of a problem we've been > discussing on lkml and linux-mm for several months now (although Linus > asking for DMA presumably means it's not as well known as I thought > it was). > > Basically, when you need to resort to paging for getting work done on > 2.6 you're screwed. Your bk export takes a lot more memory than you > have RAM in your machine, right? Right. I have 120MB RAM and 256MB swap partition. That corresponds to the 85 to 90 percent top says I am spending in iowait.