From: Thomas Molina <tmolina@cablespeed.com>
To: Roger Luethi <rl@hellgate.ch>
Cc: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.0 performance problems
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 20:27:34 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0312312014480.3069@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031231210354.GA9804@k3.hellgate.ch>
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, Roger Luethi wrote:
> For the systematic testing, I used "qsbench -p 4 -m 96" on a 256 MB
> machine. This allowed the kernel to achieve high performance with
> unfairness -- that's what 2.4 does: One process dominates all others
> and finishes very early, taking away most of the memory pressure.
> The spike for qsbench in 2.5.39 remains if only one process is forked
> (-p1 -m 384), though.
>
> I asked for the bk export numbers with 2.5.39 because I'm curious how
> close to qsbench the behavior really is.
2.5.39 won't compile for me "out of the box". I thought it might have
been the toolset, but I was running RH8 and it has gcc 3.2. Was there a
big change between 3.2 and 3.3.2 in Fedora Core 1? The reason I ask is
that I also can't get NISTNet to compile on Fedora Core 1 or RHEL WS 3.
It looks like incompatible libraries.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-01 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-29 22:07 Thomas Molina
2003-12-29 22:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-29 22:58 ` Thomas Molina
2003-12-29 23:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-30 14:14 ` Thomas Molina
2003-12-30 14:39 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-30 21:14 ` Thomas Molina
2003-12-30 21:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-31 0:50 ` Thomas Molina
2003-12-31 1:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-31 1:34 ` Andrew Morton
2003-12-31 11:25 ` bert hubert
2003-12-30 21:35 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-30 23:46 ` Roger Luethi
2003-12-30 18:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-29 23:14 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-12-30 5:09 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-30 10:27 ` Thomas Molina
2003-12-29 23:25 ` David B. Stevens
2003-12-29 23:05 ` Thomas Molina
2003-12-29 23:43 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-12-30 0:17 ` Thomas Molina
2003-12-30 1:23 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-12-30 1:27 ` Dave Jones
2003-12-30 1:37 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-12-30 1:40 ` Dave Jones
2003-12-30 1:49 ` Thomas Molina
2003-12-30 2:03 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-03 19:37 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-12-30 1:25 ` Roger Luethi
2003-12-30 1:37 ` Thomas Molina
2003-12-30 19:21 ` Andy Isaacson
2003-12-30 19:40 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-30 22:24 ` Roger Luethi
2003-12-31 0:33 ` Thomas Molina
2003-12-31 10:17 ` Roger Luethi
2003-12-31 11:21 ` Jens Axboe
2003-12-31 21:03 ` Roger Luethi
2004-01-01 1:27 ` Thomas Molina [this message]
2004-01-01 10:23 ` Roger Luethi
2004-01-01 23:09 ` Roger Luethi
2004-01-02 10:11 ` Jens Axboe
2003-12-30 1:27 ` Thomas Molina
2003-12-30 2:53 ` Thomas Molina
2003-12-30 11:41 Samium Gromoff
2004-01-03 19:54 ` Bill Davidsen
[not found] ` <200312300855.00741.edt@aei.ca>
2004-01-05 12:33 ` Samium Gromoff
2004-01-05 15:09 ` Ed Tomlinson
2004-01-06 2:23 ` David Lang
2004-01-06 14:44 ` Samium Gromoff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0312312014480.3069@localhost.localdomain \
--to=tmolina@cablespeed.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rl@hellgate.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®