From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266585AbUBMBsZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2004 20:48:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266619AbUBMBsY (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2004 20:48:24 -0500 Received: from p68.rivermarket.wintek.com ([208.13.56.68]:1152 "EHLO dust") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266585AbUBMBr5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2004 20:47:57 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 20:50:54 -0500 (EST) From: Alex Goddard To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PATCH, RFC: 2.6 Documentation/Codingstyle In-Reply-To: <20040212153802.65adae84.rddunlap@osdl.org> Message-ID: References: <200402130615.10608.mhf@linuxmail.org> <20040212153802.65adae84.rddunlap@osdl.org> X-GPG-PUBLIC_KEY: N/a X-GPG-FINGERPRINT: BCBC 0868 DB78 22F3 A657 785D 6E3B 7ACB 584E B835 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 06:15:10 +0800 Michael Frank wrote: > | +Printing numbers in parenthesis ie (%d) is deprecated > > I don't know that we reached any concensus on these. I think > that these comments are just noise (IMO of course). > I guess I'll spell out "do not" and "cannot". You also didn't correct the last incorrect use of "parenthesis" when he meant "parentheses." Of course, one would hope by this point in your email he'd have ... gotten the point. -- Alex Goddard agoddard at purdue dot edu