From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266613AbUBQV0D (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:26:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266608AbUBQVZr (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:25:47 -0500 Received: from sphinx.mythic-beasts.com ([195.82.107.246]:34057 "EHLO sphinx.mythic-beasts.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266581AbUBQVXn (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:23:43 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 21:23:38 +0000 (GMT) From: Matthew Kirkwood X-X-Sender: matthew@sphinx.mythic-beasts.com To: Jamie Lokier cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: UTF-8 practically vs. theoretically in the VFS API In-Reply-To: <20040217205707.GF24311@mail.shareable.org> Message-ID: References: <20040216200321.GB17015@schmorp.de> <20040216222618.GF18853@mail.shareable.org> <20040217071448.GA8846@schmorp.de> <20040217161111.GE8231@schmorp.de> <20040217164651.GB23499@mail.shareable.org> <20040217205707.GF24311@mail.shareable.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Jamie Lokier wrote: > No, I think hacking the terminal I/O is the best bet here. Then _all_ > programs which currently work with UTF-8 terminals, which is rapidly > becoming most of them, will work the same with both kinds of terminal, > and the illusion of perfection will be complete and beautiful. Yep. A charset-translating tty proxy, a little like screen or detachtty is what you want. I wonder if there's an SSH client or server which can do that. Matthew.