From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261587AbUBURjk (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Feb 2004 12:39:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261589AbUBURjk (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Feb 2004 12:39:40 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:35553 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261587AbUBURjj (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Feb 2004 12:39:39 -0500 Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 09:44:52 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Pavel Machek cc: Stephen Hemminger , ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kernel/microcode.c error from new 64bit code In-Reply-To: <20040221173449.GA277@elf.ucw.cz> Message-ID: References: <20040218145218.6bae77b5@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> <20040221141608.GB310@elf.ucw.cz> <20040221173449.GA277@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Pavel Machek wrote: > > I'm just afraid that someone will mail you a patch replacing that with > >> 32 and you'll overlook it. Well, the good news is that ">> 32" should cause gcc to complain with a big warning (exactly because it's undefined brhaviour on a 32-bit architecture), so I don't think it's easy to overlook. Linus