From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262538AbUEAW6G (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 May 2004 18:58:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262547AbUEAW6G (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 May 2004 18:58:06 -0400 Received: from dragnfire.mtl.istop.com ([66.11.160.179]:56822 "EHLO dsl.commfireservices.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262538AbUEAW6D (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 May 2004 18:58:03 -0400 Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 18:58:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Zwane Mwaikambo To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kaos@sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH][2.6-mm] Allow i386 to reenable interrupts on lock contention In-Reply-To: <20040501155116.6ac6e253.akpm@osdl.org> Message-ID: References: <2015.1083331968@ocs3.ocs.com.au> <20040501143955.10d1cea1.akpm@osdl.org> <20040501155116.6ac6e253.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 1 May 2004, Andrew Morton wrote: > Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > > > > On Sat, 1 May 2004, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > Could we move all the irq-handling stuff into the out-of-line section, to > > > keep the fast-path cache footprint smaller? > > > > Of course, oversight on my part. Done and restested. > > Thanks. Would be nice to find some test which showed improved throughput > from this ;) I'll see if i can locate something or put something together and report back. Zwane