From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263810AbUECSVx (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 May 2004 14:21:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263815AbUECSVw (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 May 2004 14:21:52 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:41191 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263810AbUECSVv (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 May 2004 14:21:51 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 11:20:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: davidm@hpl.hp.com cc: Andrew Morton , bunk@fs.tum.de, eyal@eyal.emu.id.au, linux-dvb-maintainer@linuxtv.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.6-rc3: modular DVB tda1004x broken In-Reply-To: <16534.35355.671554.321611@napali.hpl.hp.com> Message-ID: References: <408F9BD8.8000203@eyal.emu.id.au> <20040501201342.GL2541@fs.tum.de> <20040501161035.67205a1f.akpm@osdl.org> <20040501175134.243b389c.akpm@osdl.org> <16534.35355.671554.321611@napali.hpl.hp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 3 May 2004, David Mosberger wrote: > > Why not just disallow user-level use of the _syscall() macros. I'm thinking we should disallow the system-calls entirely. User mode should be using their own macros, and kernel mode should just do the function call directly. How much work would that be? I suspect it would be less work than worrying about the existing strange interfaces. Linus