From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262380AbUEFOjv (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 May 2004 10:39:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262381AbUEFOjv (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 May 2004 10:39:51 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:46278 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262380AbUEFOju (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 May 2004 10:39:50 -0400 Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 07:39:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Andrey Panin , Andrew Morton cc: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [RFC] DMI cleanup patches In-Reply-To: <20040506102904.GA3295@pazke> Message-ID: References: <20040506102904.GA3295@pazke> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 6 May 2004, Andrey Panin wrote: > > currently arch/i386/kernel/dmi_scan.c file looks like complete > mess. Interfacing with other kernel subsystem made using > ad-hoc ways, mostly with ugly global variables, additionaly > coding style is ... not good. So these patches appear: The patches look good by me, but I'd rather leave them to after 2.6.6, since they seem to be cleanups rather than serious bug-fixes. Andrew? Linus