From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][PPC64] Don't clear MSR.RI in do_hash_page_DSI
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 09:25:45 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405240916410.32189@ppc970.osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16561.60519.989823.14745@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Ok,
looks like somebody has bought into the sign-off procedure. Great.
Except that I (and my tools) expected for the "Signed-off-by:" line to go
into the comment section _before_ the patch (and after the "explanation")
and obviously didn't make that part very clear.
The reason for that is partly because that's how all the current source
control helper tools work by extracting the changeset comments (but that
could certainly be changed), but more importantly because with a large
patch, it's very very easy to overlook the sign-off at the end of the
patch.
I only noticed after I applied this, so now you didn't get the distinction
of being the first changeset ever to have the sign-off thing recorded ;^)
.. and the race is on.
(Seriously, while nobody has actually complained about the suggested
rules, I don't think anybody should feel compelled to do the sign-off
before we've had more time to let people argue over it. People who feel
comfortable with the suggestion are obviously encouraged to start asap,
though).
Linus
On Mon, 24 May 2004, Paul Mackerras wrote:
>
> Some code that is used on iSeries (do_hash_page_DSI in head.S) was
> clearing the RI (recoverable interrupt) bit in the MSR when it
> shouldn't. We were getting SLB miss interrupts following that which
> were panicking because they appeared to have occurred at a bad place.
> This patch fixes the problem.
>
> Please apply.
>
> Thanks,
> Paul.
>
> diff -puN arch/ppc64/kernel/head.S~ibm-ppc64-hash-page-ri arch/ppc64/kernel/head.S
> --- forakpm/arch/ppc64/kernel/head.S~ibm-ppc64-hash-page-ri 2004-05-24 15:14:13.809492931 +1000
> +++ forakpm-anton/arch/ppc64/kernel/head.S 2004-05-24 15:14:13.816492844 +1000
> @@ -946,7 +946,7 @@ _GLOBAL(do_hash_page_DSI)
> */
> mfmsr r0
> li r4,0
> - ori r4,r4,MSR_EE+MSR_RI
> + ori r4,r4,MSR_EE
> andc r0,r0,r4
> mtmsrd r0 /* Hard Disable, RI off */
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-24 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-24 12:36 Paul Mackerras
2004-05-24 16:25 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2004-06-04 5:40 Paul Mackerras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0405240916410.32189@ppc970.osdl.org \
--to=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®