From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
Subject: Re: Cleanups for APIC
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 09:15:00 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405270856120.28319@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040525124937.GA13347@elf.ucw.cz>
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Pavel Machek wrote:
> This cleans up io_apic.c a bit -- I do not really like 4 copies of same
> code. Does it look okay to apply?
yeah, agreed - i checked & test it, it's ok. I made a small modification
(see the patch below) to uninline the __modify_IO_APIC_irq() function -
shaving 0.5K off the kernel's size ...
(wrt. io_apic_sync(): i added it in 2.1.104 together with some other
changes - i dont this it's necessary anymore - the local APICs had
writearound erratas, but i dont remember this ever being necessary for
IO-APICs. I'll address this in another patch.)
Ingo
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
--- linux/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c.orig
+++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c
@@ -41,8 +41,6 @@
#include "io_ports.h"
-#undef APIC_LOCKUP_DEBUG
-
#define APIC_LOCKUP_DEBUG
static spinlock_t ioapic_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
@@ -127,83 +125,50 @@ static void __init replace_pin_at_irq(un
}
}
-/* mask = 1 */
-static void __mask_IO_APIC_irq (unsigned int irq)
+static void __modify_IO_APIC_irq (unsigned int irq, unsigned long enable, unsigned long disable)
{
- int pin;
struct irq_pin_list *entry = irq_2_pin + irq;
+ unsigned int pin, reg;
for (;;) {
- unsigned int reg;
pin = entry->pin;
if (pin == -1)
break;
reg = io_apic_read(entry->apic, 0x10 + pin*2);
- io_apic_modify(entry->apic, 0x10 + pin*2, reg |= 0x00010000);
+ reg &= ~disable;
+ reg |= enable;
+ io_apic_modify(entry->apic, 0x10 + pin*2, reg);
if (!entry->next)
break;
entry = irq_2_pin + entry->next;
}
+}
+
+/* mask = 1 */
+static void __mask_IO_APIC_irq (unsigned int irq)
+{
+ struct irq_pin_list *entry = irq_2_pin + irq;
+ __modify_IO_APIC_irq(irq, 0x00010000, 0);
+ /* Is it needed? Or do others need it too? */
io_apic_sync(entry->apic);
}
/* mask = 0 */
static void __unmask_IO_APIC_irq (unsigned int irq)
{
- int pin;
- struct irq_pin_list *entry = irq_2_pin + irq;
-
- for (;;) {
- unsigned int reg;
- pin = entry->pin;
- if (pin == -1)
- break;
- reg = io_apic_read(entry->apic, 0x10 + pin*2);
- io_apic_modify(entry->apic, 0x10 + pin*2, reg &= 0xfffeffff);
- if (!entry->next)
- break;
- entry = irq_2_pin + entry->next;
- }
+ __modify_IO_APIC_irq(irq, 0, 0x00010000);
}
/* mask = 1, trigger = 0 */
static void __mask_and_edge_IO_APIC_irq (unsigned int irq)
{
- int pin;
- struct irq_pin_list *entry = irq_2_pin + irq;
-
- for (;;) {
- unsigned int reg;
- pin = entry->pin;
- if (pin == -1)
- break;
- reg = io_apic_read(entry->apic, 0x10 + pin*2);
- reg = (reg & 0xffff7fff) | 0x00010000;
- io_apic_modify(entry->apic, 0x10 + pin*2, reg);
- if (!entry->next)
- break;
- entry = irq_2_pin + entry->next;
- }
+ __modify_IO_APIC_irq(irq, 0x00010000, 0x00008000);
}
/* mask = 0, trigger = 1 */
static void __unmask_and_level_IO_APIC_irq (unsigned int irq)
{
- int pin;
- struct irq_pin_list *entry = irq_2_pin + irq;
-
- for (;;) {
- unsigned int reg;
- pin = entry->pin;
- if (pin == -1)
- break;
- reg = io_apic_read(entry->apic, 0x10 + pin*2);
- reg = (reg & 0xfffeffff) | 0x00008000;
- io_apic_modify(entry->apic, 0x10 + pin*2, reg);
- if (!entry->next)
- break;
- entry = irq_2_pin + entry->next;
- }
+ __modify_IO_APIC_irq(irq, 0x00008000, 0x00010000);
}
static void mask_IO_APIC_irq (unsigned int irq)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-27 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-25 12:49 Pavel Machek
2004-05-27 13:15 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2004-05-27 13:30 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-05-27 13:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-05-27 14:03 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-05-27 14:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-05-27 14:26 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0405270856120.28319@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®