mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>
Cc: Michael Buesch <mbuesch@freenet.de>,
	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staircase scheduler v7.4
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:15:47 +1000 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0406281013590.11399@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1088373352.1691.1.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com>

On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:

> On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 21:28 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > Quoting Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>:
> > > On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 19:29 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Now another "problem":
> > > > Maybe it's because I'm tired, but it seems like
> > > > your fix-patch made moving windows in X11 is less smooth.
> > > > I wanted to mention it, just in case there's some other
> > > > person, who sees this behaviour, too. In case I'm the
> > > > only one seeing it, you may forget it. ;)
> > > 
> > > I can see the same with 7.4-1 (that's 2.6.7-ck2 plus the fix-patch): X11
> > > feels sluggish while moving windows around. Simply by loading a Web page
> > > into Konqueror and dragging Evolution over it, makes me able to
> > > reproduce this problem.
> > > 
> > > Doing the same on 2.6.7-mm3 is totally smooth, however.
> > 
> > I think staircase-7.7 fixed this, too. (for me).
> > Have a try.
> 
> Staircase 7.7 over 2.6.7-ck2 still feels somewhat sluggish... Renicing X
> to -5 seems to improve a bit, but -mm3 is smoother and does not require
> renicing the X server.

Hi

I seem to have an oversight with ck in the batch implementation that may 
be causing problems that wouldn't happen if you used the standalone 
staircase patch. Can you try the standalone s7.7 patch (not from the split 
out patches in the ck directory) that is in my patches/2.6/2.6.7 
directory?

Thanks
Con

  reply	other threads:[~2004-06-28  0:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-25 16:40 Michael Buesch
2004-06-25 16:46 ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-25 18:44   ` Michael Buesch
2004-06-25 19:05     ` Willy Tarreau
2004-06-25 19:48       ` Michael Buesch
2004-06-26  1:11         ` kernel
2004-06-26 16:33           ` Michael Buesch
2004-06-26 17:29           ` Michael Buesch
2004-06-27  9:14             ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 19:17             ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-27 19:28               ` Michael Buesch
2004-06-27 21:55                 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-28  0:15                   ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2004-06-28  8:40                     ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-28  8:49                       ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-28 11:53                         ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-28 12:11                           ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-28 15:03                             ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2004-06-28 15:19                               ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-28 15:39                                 ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2004-06-28 17:11                             ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-29  4:36                               ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-28 23:21                         ` Peter Williams
2004-06-29  4:44                           ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-29  6:01                             ` Ed Sweetman
2004-06-29  6:55                               ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-26  2:05         ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 10:24         ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 10:27           ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 23:50             ` Peter Williams
2004-06-27 12:00         ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 12:04           ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 12:54             ` Michael Buesch
2004-06-27 13:15               ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-25 16:46 ` Michael Buesch
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-25 14:38 Con Kolivas
2004-06-25 18:32 ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-06-26  1:28   ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-25 22:20 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-06-26  1:05   ` kernel
2004-06-26 20:04 ` Wes Janzen
2004-06-26 20:11   ` Michael Buesch
2004-06-26 21:14     ` Wes Janzen
2004-06-26 21:38       ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-06-27  9:16   ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 11:40     ` Grzegorz Kulewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0406281013590.11399@kolivas.org \
    --to=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbuesch@freenet.de \
    --cc=willy@w.ods.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®