From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266509AbUGKHNi (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jul 2004 03:13:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266511AbUGKHNi (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jul 2004 03:13:38 -0400 Received: from dragnfire.mtl.istop.com ([66.11.160.179]:46055 "EHLO dsl.commfireservices.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266509AbUGKHNh (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jul 2004 03:13:37 -0400 Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 03:16:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Zwane Mwaikambo To: Con Kolivas Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [announce] [patch] Voluntary Kernel Preemption Patch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20040709182638.GA11310@elte.hu> <20040709195105.GA4807@infradead.org> <20040710124814.GA27345@elte.hu> <40F0075C.2070607@kolivas.org> <20040710151455.GA29140@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <40F008B0.8020702@kolivas.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Con Kolivas wrote: > > > Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 01:12:28AM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > > > > > >>I've conducted some of the old fashioned Benno's latency test on this > > > > > > > > > is that the test which skews with irq's disabled ? (eg uses normal > > > interrupts and not nmi's for it's initial time inrq) > > > > It probably is; in which case all these results would be useless, no? > > > > http://www.gardena.net/benno/linux/latencytest-0.42.tar.gz > > I think Arjan is referring to rtl_latencytest.c Brain packet loss, make that rtc_latencytest.c