From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265207AbUGTC7t (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jul 2004 22:59:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265229AbUGTC7t (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jul 2004 22:59:49 -0400 Received: from [81.173.6.10] ([81.173.6.10]:47577 "HELO vivaldi.madbase.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S265207AbUGTC7s (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jul 2004 22:59:48 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 22:59:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Eric Lammerts X-X-Sender: eric@vivaldi.madbase.net To: John McCutchan cc: Chris Friesen , Ian Kent , Davide Libenzi , Linux Kernel Mailing List , nautilus-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] inotify 0.5 In-Reply-To: <1090272690.6954.1.camel@vertex> Message-ID: References: <40FBCD8F.1080300@nortelnetworks.com> <40FBCD8F.1080300@nortelnetworks.com> <1090272690.6954.1.camel@vertex> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, John McCutchan wrote: > Also the maximum number of devices that can be opened at a time is > 8. Why is that limit there? There doesn't seem to be any particular need for it in the code... Why not remove watcher_count altogether? Eric