From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265661AbUHCKxY (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Aug 2004 06:53:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265697AbUHCKxY (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Aug 2004 06:53:24 -0400 Received: from holly.csn.ul.ie ([136.201.105.4]:8629 "EHLO holly.csn.ul.ie") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265661AbUHCKxW (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Aug 2004 06:53:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 11:53:01 +0100 (IST) From: Dave Airlie X-X-Sender: airlied@skynet To: dri-devel@lists.sf.net Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: drm mailing list? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Okay the people who are interested in the future of the DRM seem to be fairly evenly split between dri-devel and linux-kernel mailing lists, I'm not going to subscribe to lk (I've been there and I quite enjoy having a life :-), and I know a fair few lk people won't want to join dri-devel as DRM isn't the only thing going on there... So is there a requirement for having a drm mailing list? I'm sure fd.o will oblige if I ask, I expect it to be fairly low traffic with mostly patch and future directions discussions... If anyone thinks this is a really bad idea let me know, otherwise I'll probably start the ball rolling before the end of the week.. Dave. -- David Airlie, Software Engineer http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at skynet.ie pam_smb / Linux DECstation / Linux VAX / ILUG person