From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265002AbUHHCog (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Aug 2004 22:44:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265022AbUHHCog (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Aug 2004 22:44:36 -0400 Received: from vivaldi.madbase.net ([81.173.6.10]:197 "HELO vivaldi.madbase.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S265002AbUHHCof (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Aug 2004 22:44:35 -0400 Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 22:44:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Eric Lammerts X-X-Sender: eric@vivaldi.madbase.net To: Juergen Pabel cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Masking kernel commandline parameters (2.6.7) In-Reply-To: <200408080413.29905.jpabel@akkaya.de> Message-ID: References: <200408080413.29905.jpabel@akkaya.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 8 Aug 2004, Juergen Pabel wrote: > my patch allows for kernel commandline parameters (ie: from > bootloader) to be masked in order to prevent later retrieval > In other news: I am thinking of setting up a special > kernel+initrd/initramfs project that will ask the user "nicely" to > authenticate That would make that ugly kernel patch pointless, wouldn't it? Then why bother with it? Eric