From: William Stearns <wstearns@pobox.com>
To: Ram Chandar <rcknl@qz.port5.com>
Cc: ML-linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
William Stearns <wstearns@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: Linux Routing Performance inferior?
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 13:58:28 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0409081354470.2985@sparrow> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200409071000.58455.rchandar-knl@qz.port5.com>
Good afternoon, Ram,
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Ram Chandar wrote:
> Quoted from a recent mail to freebsd mailing list.
>
> "FreeBSD (5.x) can route 1Mpps on a 2.8G Xeon while
> Linux can't do much more than 100kpps"
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2004-September/004840.html
>
> Is this indeed the case?
I'm sure others here have far better examples, but one post to the
netfilter-devel list last December provided an example of a firewall that
could process 580kpps with netfilter/conntrack turned off. Granted, the
post noted that adding netfilter brought that down to 450kpps, and adding
conntrack on top of that brought it down to 295kpps, but all three of
those numbers are well over the claimed 100kpps.
Cheers,
- Bill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"While it may be true that a watched pot never boils, the one
you don't keep an eye on can make an awful mess of your stove."
-- Edward Stevenson
(Courtesy of Slashdot)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
William Stearns (wstearns@pobox.com). Mason, Buildkernel, freedups, p0f,
rsync-backup, ssh-keyinstall, dns-check, more at: http://www.stearns.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-08 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-08 17:36 Ram Chandar
2004-09-08 17:58 ` William Stearns [this message]
2004-09-08 18:41 ` Nathan Bryant
2004-09-08 19:21 ` Tomasz Torcz
2004-09-08 18:56 ` Norbert van Nobelen
2004-09-08 19:01 ` Matt Kavanagh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0409081354470.2985@sparrow \
--to=wstearns@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rcknl@qz.port5.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®