From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261213AbVBFRFc (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:05:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261217AbVBFRFb (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:05:31 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:22403 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261213AbVBFRFV (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Feb 2005 12:05:21 -0500 Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 09:05:05 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Andi Kleen cc: Arjan van de Ven , akpm@osdl.org, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, drepper@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL/PATCH] Remove PT_GNU_STACK support before 2.6.11 In-Reply-To: <20050206123355.GB30109@wotan.suse.de> Message-ID: References: <20050206113635.GA30109@wotan.suse.de> <20050206114758.GA8437@infradead.org> <20050206123355.GB30109@wotan.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, Andi Kleen wrote: > > There are probably more. So? Do you expect to never fix them, or what? The fact is, a program that tries to execute without using PROT_EXEC is a buggy program. Are there buggy programs out there? Yes. We should fix them. Linus