From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261675AbVCJDtd (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 22:49:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261688AbVCJDqy (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 22:46:54 -0500 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:12163 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261281AbVCJDp4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 22:45:56 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 19:47:31 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Omkhar Arasaratnam cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Linux Kernel list , tgall@us.ibm.com, antonb@au1.ibm.com, James Bottomley , Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.11- sym53c8xx Broken on pp64 In-Reply-To: <422FC042.40303@ca.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <422FA817.4060400@ca.ibm.com> <1110420620.32525.145.camel@gaston> <422FBACF.90108@ca.ibm.com> <422FC042.40303@ca.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote: > > I confirmed that this occurs with the 2.6.11 code straight from > kernel.org Here is an error from the bringup: So if 2.6.9 works, and 2.6.11 does not, can you check 2.6.10? And perhaps hunt it down even more, to a -rc release? > sym0: No NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-80 LVD, parity checking > CACHE TEST FAILED: DMA error (dstat=0xa0) .sym0: CACHE INCORRECTLY CONFIGURED > sym0: giving up ... There are certainly sym changes in there too since 2.6.9, let's see if James or Willy have any suggestions. It might not be ppc64-specific. Linus