From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261772AbVCaUHV (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:07:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261761AbVCaUHV (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:07:21 -0500 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:15807 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261759AbVCaUHI (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:07:08 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:08:56 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: "Chen, Kenneth W" cc: "'Ingo Molnar'" , "'Nick Piggin'" , "'Andrew Morton'" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <200503311953.j2VJrog22170@unix-os.sc.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Can you post oprofile data for a run? Btw, I realize that you can't give good oprofiles for the user-mode components, but a kernel profile with even just single "time spent in user mode" datapoint would be good, since a kernel scheduling problem might just make caches work worse, and so the biggest negative might be visible in the amount of time we spend in user mode due to more cache misses.. Linus