From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261329AbVFHX0m (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2005 19:26:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261364AbVFHX0m (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2005 19:26:42 -0400 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:57216 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261329AbVFHX0l (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2005 19:26:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:28:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Paul Mackerras cc: akpm@osdl.org, anton@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jk@blackdown.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppc64: Fix PER_LINUX32 behaviour In-Reply-To: <17063.31568.618739.165823@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <17062.56723.535978.961340@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <17063.31568.618739.165823@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Paul Mackerras wrote: > > Interestingly, PER_LINUX32 has nothing whatsoever to do with whether a > process is running in 32-bit or 64-bit mode. In fact, the *only* > thing that PER_LINUX32 affects is the machine name reported by uname. > So you can have a 32-bit process without PER_LINUX32, and a 64-bit > process with PER_LINUX32. Ok, I stand corrected. I was assuming it got set automatically for 32-bit processes, without checking. Linus