From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263083AbVGNTDO (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2005 15:03:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261636AbVGNTBC (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2005 15:01:02 -0400 Received: from mailwasher.lanl.gov ([192.65.95.54]:29859 "EHLO mailwasher-b.lanl.gov") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261654AbVGNTAF (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2005 15:00:05 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:00:01 -0600 (MDT) From: "Ronald G. Minnich" To: yhlu cc: Stefan Reinauer , LinuxBIOS , discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: NUMA support for dual core Opteron In-Reply-To: <2ea3fae10507141058c476927@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <2ea3fae10507141058c476927@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org if there is any chance of getting along without ACPI entries that is best. Linux did do this once already, for SMP K8: K8 can boot and run NUMA without an SRAT table. What more is needed for dual core, and could Linux support in this area be extended? ron