From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263172AbVG3Ugu (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:36:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263159AbVG3Ugl (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:36:41 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:39894 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263157AbVG3Uey (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:34:54 -0400 Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:34:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Hugh Dickins cc: Andrew Morton , Dominik Brodowski , Daniel Ritz , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Len Brown Subject: Re: revert yenta free_irq on suspend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > Please revert the yenta free_irq on suspend patch (below) > which went into 2.6.13-rc4 after 2.6.13-rc3-git9. Ok. Will do. And the ACPI people had better stop doing this crazy thing in the first place. There's really no point at all to freeing and re-requesting the interrupts, and the IRQ controller should just re-initialize itself instead. The excuse for not doing so was totally ludicrous in the first place, if I recall correctly. Use GFP_ATOMIC in ACPI if you do things with interrupts disabled, don't break a million drivers. Linus