From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750967AbVHIXOI (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2005 19:14:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750969AbVHIXOI (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2005 19:14:08 -0400 Received: from mail-in-02.arcor-online.net ([151.189.21.42]:30880 "EHLO mail-in-02.arcor-online.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750967AbVHIXOG (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2005 19:14:06 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 01:13:57 +0200 (CEST) From: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@gmx.de> To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt cc: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@gmx.de>, LKML , linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: Regression: radeonfb: No synchronisation on CRT with linux-2.6.13-rc5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1123195493.30257.75.camel@gaston> <1123401069.30257.102.camel@gaston> <3EF2003B-12DF-4EBB-B304-59614AEFAA09@mac.com> <1123451289.30257.118.camel@gaston> <1123489200.30257.133.camel@gaston> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-be10.7eggert.dyndns.org-MailScanner-Information: See www.mailscanner.info for information X-be10.7eggert.dyndns.org-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-be10.7eggert.dyndns.org-MailScanner-From: 7eggert@web.de Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Bodo Eggert wrote: > On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 02:06 +0200, Bodo Eggert wrote: > > > The wrong values are constant across reboots (see my first mail), and I > > > have a CRT. > > > > > > Can you tell me where the timing values are read? > > > > radeon_write_mode() programs the mode. The monitor timing infos are read > > by the various bits of code in radeon_monitor.c > > > > I'd be curious if you could identify what bit of code is misbehaving > > I added preempt_*able around radeon_probe_i2c_connector, and now I get the > output from below and still no sync. Obviously you shouldn't msleep in > preempt-disabled code. I'll try voluntary preemption, but that will at > best hide the error. Update: voluntary preemption does not cause bad readings. -- Who is General Failure and why is he reading my disk?