From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965212AbVHTALn (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:11:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965206AbVHTALn (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:11:43 -0400 Received: from kent.litech.org ([72.9.242.215]:50699 "EHLO kent.litech.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965202AbVHTALj (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:11:39 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:11:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Nathan Lutchansky To: Greg KH cc: LKML , lm-sensors Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] improve i2c probing In-Reply-To: <20050818185401.GA32684@kroah.com> Message-ID: References: <20050815175106.GA24959@litech.org> <20050818185401.GA32684@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 01:51:06PM -0400, Nathan Lutchansky wrote: > > This patch series makes a couple of improvements to the i2c device > > probing process. > > > > These all generally look quite good, thanks. But it looks like you and > Jean went back and forth on a few issues, care to repost an updated > series of patches based on that exchange so I can have them get some > testing in the -mm tree? Yup, I'm going to break the series into two parts and post the first one probably tomorrow. I haven't been in a hurry since Jean's been away this week. -Nathan