From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] FUTEX_WAKE_OP (pthread_cond_signal speedup)
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:36:08 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0508231033270.18304@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050823131817.GA7403@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> ATM pthread_cond_signal is unnecessarily slow, because it wakes one
> waiter (which at least on UP usually means an immediate context switch
> to one of the waiter threads). This waiter wakes up and after a few
> instructions it attempts to acquire the cv internal lock, but that lock
> is still held by the thread calling pthread_cond_signal. So it goes
> to sleep and eventually the signalling thread is scheduled in, unlocks
> the internal lock and wakes the waiter again.
> With the following benchmark on UP x86-64 I get:
>
> for i in nptl-orig nptl-requeue nptl-wake_op; do echo time elf/ld.so --library-path .:$i /tmp/bench; \
> for j in 1 2; do echo ( time elf/ld.so --library-path .:$i /tmp/bench ) 2>&1; done; done
> time elf/ld.so --library-path .:nptl-orig /tmp/bench
> real 0m0.655s user 0m0.253s sys 0m0.403s
> real 0m0.657s user 0m0.269s sys 0m0.388s
> time elf/ld.so --library-path .:nptl-requeue /tmp/bench
> real 0m0.496s user 0m0.225s sys 0m0.271s
> real 0m0.531s user 0m0.242s sys 0m0.288s
> time elf/ld.so --library-path .:nptl-wake_op /tmp/bench
> real 0m0.380s user 0m0.176s sys 0m0.204s
> real 0m0.382s user 0m0.175s sys 0m0.207s
translation: effective thread switching is now almost twice as fast with
the WAKE_OP extension of the futex interface. Cool!
a detail: many of the futex_atomic_op_inuser() seem to be duplicated
across architectures. Might be worth putting into asm-generic, to avoid
the duplication?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-23 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-23 13:18 Jakub Jelinek
2005-08-23 14:36 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2005-08-23 14:42 ` Jakub Jelinek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0508231033270.18304@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®