From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Ktimer / -rt9 (+custom) monotonic_clock going backwards.
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 03:46:53 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0510200340110.27683@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051020073416.GA28581@elte.hu>
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> if the bug is only possible when timesources are changed on the fly,
> then i think it shouldnt happen. We pick our sources at bootup time and
> stick with them.
>
> in the -rt tree we also have clockevents and HRT support, so the clocks
> used should depend on whether you have the APIC enabled in the .config,
> and whether the BIOS has it enabled by default. If the BIOS has the APIC
> disabled then you can force the kernel to enable it by adding "lapic" to
> the boot-line.
On this test machine, I had to add the lapic command line, but that was
there when I first had to get NMI working on this machine back in the V0.7
days :-)
>
> without the APIC active, the equation is simple: we use the PIT for both
> jiffies and HRT. We use the TSC for gettimeofday. No interaction between
> the two.
>
> if the APIC is active, then we have both the local APIC timer interrupt
> for and the PIT for HRT timing. The clockevents framework sees both
> hardware clocks and automatically decides which one to use, based on
> their ranking. A typical PIT reprogramming PIO sequence takes 20-30
> usecs, while a typical APIC timer reprogramming takes ~5 nanoseconds on
> my box, so the choice is rather easy ;-) The jiffies interrupt is still
> off the PIT. gettimeofday is off the TSC counter.
>
> i could imagine the following hardware effects to cause time warps:
>
> - the TSC is in fact the 'read counter' method of the local APIC timer
> hardware. So there can be interactions in theory: programming the APIC
> timer could impact the TSC and vice versa. There have been CPU
> erratums in this area in the past.
Could this cause a 2 second drop backwards?
>
> - powersaving can impact the TSC - and can thus impact the APIC timer
> too. Errata-land as well.
Well, this machine is a normal PC not a laptop, and anyway, this backwards
clock happened during a stress test with pretty much 100% CPU usage, so I
think we can rule out power saving.
>
> - the TSC itself could have short, temporary warps. I had a box that
> showed such effects.
Can this be a 2 second warp?
>
> besides hardware bugs, another, albeit very small possibility is that
> somewhere in the thousands of lines of shiny-new generic-time-of-day,
> ktimers, clockevents and high-res-timers code, there is a software bug,
> which is causing time warps ;-)
>
My older code first used jiffies as a timer, then I switched to TSC and
then to APIC timer, and then finally ktimer. ktimer was the first to show
a backwards get_time.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-20 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-19 14:59 Steven Rostedt
2005-10-19 15:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-10-19 18:39 ` john stultz
2005-10-20 6:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-20 7:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-20 7:46 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2005-10-20 8:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-20 8:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-20 8:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-20 9:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-20 9:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-20 10:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-20 10:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-20 15:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-20 16:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-20 16:45 ` john stultz
2005-10-20 16:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-20 17:05 ` john stultz
2005-10-20 19:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-20 20:05 ` john stultz
2005-10-20 20:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-21 6:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-21 7:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-10-21 7:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-21 8:00 ` ktimer API Steven Rostedt
2005-10-21 8:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-10-21 18:09 ` Ktimer / -rt9 (+custom) monotonic_clock going backwards john stultz
2005-10-21 18:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-10-20 22:06 ` George Anzinger
2005-10-20 6:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-20 14:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-20 15:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-20 15:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-20 16:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-19 15:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-20 6:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-20 6:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-19 15:21 ` Daniel Walker
2005-10-20 6:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-20 15:02 ` Daniel Walker
2005-10-20 22:19 ` George Anzinger
2005-10-20 23:23 ` john stultz
2005-10-19 16:44 ` Frank Sorenson
2005-10-20 6:43 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0510200340110.27683@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®