From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964923AbWEOOFT (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 May 2006 10:05:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964928AbWEOOFT (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 May 2006 10:05:19 -0400 Received: from ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.55]:20872 "EHLO ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964923AbWEOOFR (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 May 2006 10:05:17 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 10:05:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Steven Rostedt X-X-Sender: rostedt@gandalf.stny.rr.com To: Daniel Walker cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH -rt] scheduling while atomic in fs/file.c In-Reply-To: <1147701098.15392.49.camel@c-67-180-134-207.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> Message-ID: References: <200605141545.k4EFj6Cv001901@dwalker1.mvista.com> <1147627976.15392.39.camel@c-67-180-134-207.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <1147701098.15392.49.camel@c-67-180-134-207.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 15 May 2006, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 03:04 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > Just to clarify, although fdtable_defer_list_init(int cpu) creates a timer > > for each CPU but sets them to the same CPU. The mod_timer in the changed > > function is what is used to spread the timers out. > > Your right , it could migrate with my change only .. But I don't think > that a problem .. It's probably better .. My only concern is that this makes things less deterministic, but I'm probably being paranoid here. -- Steve