From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755701AbWK1VGI (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:06:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755735AbWK1VGH (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:06:07 -0500 Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net ([69.17.117.7]:28314 "EHLO mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755706AbWK1VGE (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:06:04 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:06:02 -0800 (PST) From: Trent Piepho X-X-Sender: xyzzy@shell3.speakeasy.net To: Adrian Bunk cc: v4l-dvb-maintainer@linuxtv.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] [2.6 patch] remove DVB_AV7110_FIRMWARE In-Reply-To: <20061126004500.GB15364@stusta.de> Message-ID: References: <20061126004500.GB15364@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 26 Nov 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote: > DVB_AV7110_FIRMWARE was (except for some OSS drivers) the only option > that was still compiling a binary-only user-supplied firmware file at > build-time into the kernel. > > This patch changes the driver to always use the standard > request_firmware() way for firmware by removing DVB_AV7110_FIRMWARE. Doesn't this also prevent the AV7110 module from getting compiled into the kernel? Shouldn't the Kconfig file be adjusted so that 'y' can't be selected anymore and it depends on MODULES?