From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758088AbYGXPN6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:13:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757245AbYGXPNt (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:13:49 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.124]:37267 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754063AbYGXPNs (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:13:48 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:13:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Steven Rostedt X-X-Sender: rostedt@gandalf.stny.rr.com To: Mathieu Desnoyers cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Masami Hiramatsu , "Frank Ch. Eigler" , Hideo AOKI , Takashi Nishiie , Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu Subject: Re: [patch 08/17] LTTng instrumentation - kernel In-Reply-To: <20080724143009.GA8094@Krystal> Message-ID: References: <20080715222604.331269462@polymtl.ca> <20080715222747.761260243@polymtl.ca> <20080724143009.GA8094@Krystal> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > * Steven Rostedt (rostedt@goodmis.org) wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > > > > > /* > > > * Low level drivers may need that to know if they can schedule in > > > @@ -601,6 +603,7 @@ asmlinkage int printk(const char *fmt, . > > > int r; > > > > > > va_start(args, fmt); > > > + trace_kernel_printk(__builtin_return_address(0)); > > > > BTW, ftrace.h has macros that let you use CALLER_ADDR0 for > > __builtin_return_address. It also converts it from a pointer to a long, > > but makes the code look prettier. > > > > include/linux/kernel.h:#define _RET_IP_ (unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0) > > Hrm, did not see this one. So I guess we can both switch to it ? Hmm, yeah, I forgot about that. Someplaces I do use CALLER_ADDR1 and higher, but when it is just CALLER_ADDR0, then _RET_IP_ would probably be better. > > Thanks for pointing this out, -- Steve