From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265301AbTLRTiy (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:38:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265302AbTLRTiy (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:38:54 -0500 Received: from intra.cyclades.com ([64.186.161.6]:30385 "EHLO intra.cyclades.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265301AbTLRTiv (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:38:51 -0500 Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:17:31 -0200 (BRST) From: Marcelo Tosatti X-X-Sender: marcelo@logos.cnet To: Mike Fedyk Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , Martin Knoblauch , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RAID-0 read perf. decrease after 2.4.20 In-Reply-To: <20031218191318.GC6438@matchmail.com> Message-ID: References: <20031216125103.6301.qmail@web13903.mail.yahoo.com> <20031218191318.GC6438@matchmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Cyclades-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Cyclades-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Mike Fedyk wrote: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 11:41:11AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Martin Knoblauch wrote: > > > Just some feedback: > > > > > > echo 511 > /proc/sys/vm/max-readahead > > > > > > brings back the read performance of my 30 disks on 4 controller > > > LVM/RAID0. > > > > Great. > > Maybe a new default is in order? I believe the defaults have been changed because they harm smaller workloads.