From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265748AbTL3LBt (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 06:01:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265749AbTL3LBt (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 06:01:49 -0500 Received: from intra.cyclades.com ([64.186.161.6]:18099 "EHLO intra.cyclades.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265748AbTL3LBr (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 06:01:47 -0500 Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 09:00:32 -0200 (BRST) From: Marcelo Tosatti X-X-Sender: marcelo@logos.cnet To: IP v6 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kernel: kernel BUG at vmscan.c:389! In-Reply-To: <26530865.1072758531296.JavaMail.Administrator@pumbaa> Message-ID: References: <26530865.1072758531296.JavaMail.Administrator@pumbaa> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Cyclades-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Cyclades-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, IP v6 wrote: > Hello all, I've googled about the error in the subject but can't find anything about it, > I seem to be the only one having this? > > Since I couldn't find anything in Google I am mailing it to this list. > > I'm having this for the second time and needed to reboot the box and I don't know how to reproduce this. > > The kernel version is 2.4.24-pre2 with some netfilter pom patches and lufs patch > and the CPU is a Cyrix 6x86L 150MHz > I believe this was the reason why I decided to upgrade to 2.4.24-pre2 from 2.4.23 but I'm not sure anymore, I forgot... > Anyway I'm compiling 2.4.23 again now, as this may not happen when I'm out partying for newyear ;) > > Here is a *small* portion of the messages in /var/log/messages > (there is more but the mail would be too long to include them all :)). > I hope someone can do anything with this and help me. Thanks. > > > Dec 30 02:34:43 core1-fe0-gw1 kernel: kernel BUG at vmscan.c:389! > Dec 30 02:34:43 core1-fe0-gw1 kernel: invalid operand: 0000 > Dec 30 02:34:43 core1-fe0-gw1 kernel: CPU: 0 > Dec 30 02:34:43 core1-fe0-gw1 kernel: EIP: 0010:[] Tainted: P > Dec 30 02:34:43 core1-fe0-gw1 kernel: EFLAGS: 00010202 > Dec 30 02:34:43 core1-fe0-gw1 kernel: eax: 000000c4 ebx: c10215e4 ecx: 00002dd9 edx: c1160000 > Dec 30 02:34:43 core1-fe0-gw1 kernel: esi: c10215c8 edi: 00000000 ebp: 00000005 esp: c1161f30 > Dec 30 02:34:43 core1-fe0-gw1 kernel: ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018 > Dec 30 02:34:43 core1-fe0-gw1 kernel: Process kswapd (pid: 4, stackpage=c1161000) > Dec 30 02:34:43 core1-fe0-gw1 kernel: Stack: c1160000 00000bf2 00000a31 000001d0 c028c998 c2cf6fe0 c105a460 c012d632 > Dec 30 02:34:43 core1-fe0-gw1 kernel: c105a460 00000020 000001d0 c028c998 00000000 c012d6cf c1161f88 0000003c > Dec 30 02:34:43 core1-fe0-gw1 kernel: 000001d0 00000020 c012d732 c1161f88 c1161f88 c028c998 00000000 c028c998 > Dec 30 02:34:43 core1-fe0-gw1 kernel: Call Trace: [] [] [] [] [] > Dec 30 02:34:43 core1-fe0-gw1 kernel: [] [] [] [] [] Hi, This seems to be caused by the additional patches you are using. Remove them and see if the machine is still unstable.