From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265764AbTL3L7h (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 06:59:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265765AbTL3L7h (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 06:59:37 -0500 Received: from intra.cyclades.com ([64.186.161.6]:38339 "EHLO intra.cyclades.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265764AbTL3L7g (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 06:59:36 -0500 Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 09:58:19 -0200 (BRST) From: Marcelo Tosatti X-X-Sender: marcelo@logos.cnet To: Mike Fedyk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.4] Is a negative rsect in /proc/partitions normal? In-Reply-To: <20031230024331.GN1882@matchmail.com> Message-ID: References: <20031230014429.GL1882@matchmail.com> <20031229191106.I6209@schatzie.adilger.int> <20031230024331.GN1882@matchmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Cyclades-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Cyclades-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > struct hd_struct in include/linux/genhd.h:61 has them all unsigned int. > > How's this patch look against 2.4.23? > > --- drivers/block/genhd.c.orig 2003-12-29 18:35:35.000000000 -0800 > +++ drivers/block/genhd.c 2003-12-29 18:40:11.000000000 -0800 > @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ > > disk_round_stats(hd); > seq_printf(s, "%4d %4d %10d %s " > - "%d %d %d %d %d %d %d %d %d %d %d\n", > + "%u %u %u %u %u %u %u %u %u %u %u\n", > gp->major, n, gp->sizes[n], > disk_name(gp, n, buf), > hd->rd_ios, hd->rd_merges, Looks good, applied.