From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262425AbUEWJPJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 May 2004 05:15:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262450AbUEWJPJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 May 2004 05:15:09 -0400 Received: from marvin.harmless.hu ([195.70.51.173]:27879 "EHLO marvin.harmless.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262425AbUEWJPE (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 May 2004 05:15:04 -0400 Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 11:16:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Gergely Czuczy X-X-Sender: phoemix@localhost To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Linux 2.4 VS 2.6 fork VS thread creation time test, test source updated Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-HD-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 at harmless.hu Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I've updated the test code source. Now it shows the difference between the totals and the successive totals. Totals includes the calls which returned an error while the successive totals excludes them. the code is accessable at: http://phoemix.harmless.hu/pttest.cc Bye, Gergely Czuczy mailto: phoemix@harmless.hu PGP: http://phoemix.harmless.hu/phoemix.pgp "Wish a god, a star, to believe in, With the realm of king of fantasy..."