From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268219AbUHXT1i (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:27:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268235AbUHXT1i (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:27:38 -0400 Received: from mail.dif.dk ([193.138.115.101]:54983 "EHLO mail.dif.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268219AbUHXT1d (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:27:33 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 21:33:09 +0200 (CEST) From: Jesper Juhl To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: Mikael Pettersson , LKML Subject: Re: Shouldn't kconfig defaults match recommendations in help text? In-Reply-To: <20040824182930.GA7260@mars.ravnborg.org> Message-ID: References: <16683.22576.781038.756277@alkaid.it.uu.se> <20040824182930.GA7260@mars.ravnborg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 07:03:55PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > I'll post such patches in a short while. Sepperate mails, one pr patch > > changing one kconfig default pr patch. > > One Kconfig file pr. patch makes more sense. > You are right, I'll do that. Which brings me to another thing regarding configs and defaults - there does not seem to be much relation between the defaults in the various Kconfig files and the settings in arch//defconfig which puzzles me, especially since "make defconfig" seems to use the stuff from arch//defconfig and not what's specified in Kconfig... Wouldn't it make sense to update the defconfig's to match the Kconfig's when I make these changes? -- Jesper Juhl