From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266157AbUHYVjE (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Aug 2004 17:39:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266085AbUHYVjD (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Aug 2004 17:39:03 -0400 Received: from marasystems.com ([213.150.153.194]:13457 "EHLO filer.marasystems.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266157AbUHYVfi (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Aug 2004 17:35:38 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 23:35:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Henrik Nordstrom To: Harald Welte cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.9-rc1 In-Reply-To: <20040825203206.GS5824@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> Message-ID: References: <412CDFEE.1010505@triplehelix.org> <20040825203206.GS5824@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Harald Welte wrote: > The 'problem' is that we try to get a readlock while we're already > protected under a write lock. > > Please see the following [quite trivial, but yet untested] patch: > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(ip_nat_used_tuple); > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ip_nat_find_helper); Why this new exported symbol? Regards Henrik