From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269148AbUHaUQL (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:16:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267505AbUHaUPO (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:15:14 -0400 Received: from mail.dif.dk ([193.138.115.101]:24748 "EHLO mail.dif.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268985AbUHaUMQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:12:16 -0400 Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 22:18:10 +0200 (CEST) From: Jesper Juhl To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Andrew Morton , digilnux@dgii.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] 2.6.9-rc1-mm2: char/pcxx.c doesn't compile In-Reply-To: <20040831174102.GF3466@fs.tum.de> Message-ID: References: <20040830235426.441f5b51.akpm@osdl.org> <20040831174102.GF3466@fs.tum.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Adrian Bunk wrote: > static void pcxxpoll(unsigned long dummy) > { > @@ -1995,6 +1982,7 @@ > volatile struct board_chan *bc; > unsigned long flags; > int mflag = 0; > + int mstat; > > if(ch) > bc = ch->brdchan; > @@ -2069,6 +2057,7 @@ > pcxxparam(tty,ch); > memoff(ch); > restore_flags(flags); > + return 0; > } since pcxxpoll is declared with a void return, return 0; here seems pointless. A simple return; or just falling off the end of the function should be fine as far as I can see. -- Jesper Juhl