From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266578AbUJNVFL (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Oct 2004 17:05:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266896AbUJNVFC (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Oct 2004 17:05:02 -0400 Received: from scrub.xs4all.nl ([194.109.195.176]:35307 "EHLO scrub.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264639AbUJNVEW (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Oct 2004 17:04:22 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 23:03:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@scrub.home To: David Woodhouse cc: David Howells , "Rusty Russell (IBM)" , Greg KH , Arjan van de Ven , Joy Latten , lkml - Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Fw: signed kernel modules? In-Reply-To: <1097764251.318.724.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <1097626296.4013.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1096411448.3230.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1092403984.29463.11.camel@bach> <20040810002741.GA7764@kroah.com> <1092189167.22236.67.camel@bach> <19388.1092301990@redhat.com> <30797.1092308768@redhat.com> <20040812111853.GB25950@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20040812200917.GD2952@kroah.com> <26280.1092388799@redhat.com> <27175.1095936746@redhat.com> <30591.1096451074@redhat.com> <10345.1097507482@redhat.com> <1097507755.318.332.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <1097534090.16153.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1097570159.5788.1089.camel@baythorne.infradead.org> <27277.1097702318@redhat.com> <16349.1097752349@redhat.com> <1097755890.318.700.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <1097764251.318.724.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 16:22 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > > Only a minority of people do cross compile kernels, most people compile > > kernel and modules on the same machine, > > Do they? I spend half my life building kernels, and still only a tiny > minority of my boxen are actually running kernels which were built > locally. Nice how you conclude from your habits to habits of other people, but why did you ignore the rest of my mail? The primary topic of this was module signing not compile habits. bye, Roman